![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Instead of a crankshaft, how about a vibrating screen with a counterweight on the motor, motor secured to the screen & screen resting on springs? I've been doing it this way for yrs. It's virtually as noisy, but a lot less moving parts & metal fatigue.
My future stationary screener will be a lot like Lou's trommel, now that I have finally sourced a perfect conveyer belt material. Very quiet & a lot less dust & debris flying around.
__________________
Sharing knowledge is one thing that defies basic arithmetic logic --- the more you share, the more you get! Joe |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Cheers, Ap |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I haven't tried it to say for sure but the reason I think it won't work is it will shake empty but how well it would shake once you dump material on the screen. I don't think it will shake strong enough?..... Hmmm, maybe 2 of them with different weights for a good shake? Might have to try that this weekend
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it would depend on a couple of factors, 1 is the material very dry or wet, and 2 how much or how little material you dump on the deck at once? I think the vibrator idea has it's uses(
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sing it with me Reg ! ....... " if I had a million dollars, I'd buy ...."
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bahaha! No doubt!
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|