![]() |
|
Construction Equipment Tech Hydraulics, Electronics, General Engineering, ect in constr equip |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
4 valve is a 4th potential problem,,, the valve itself, servo controlling it, and programming to operate it.
Prv, pressur relief valve, is the same thing that the 4th valve is doing, just without all that extra stuff, a simple spring and bb (so to speak) For what I have been able to conclude about others using a valve to alter flow is for a possibility of non labor on the pump itself. With the servo controlled valve the oil is under no restraint (pressur) when no other valves are in use,(no stick com,and) thus releasing the flow unrestricted to circulate through the system. And not causing the motor to labor anymore to build pressure. Sounds good but just more things to go bad in my opinion. And for the Jung style pumps and planetary reduction on pump gear shaft it's just not really gaining much. Run time? Well if I can run for over an hour it may get me to add a couple min more in reality. So not much advantage. Now on the gear mesh pump the 4200 has, reliving pressur may help but again any real significance? Probably not. Prv, set it and forget it!! But one thing is to tie in an actual dial gauge to see what pressur you are actually running. It can be removed after set up or just stay if space provided. As far as motor on /off. The motor isn't too bad as far as heat from constant start stop but the esc will not like that. Fact of our type of speed controllers is that are coolest at full throttle or at max signal input. By stopping/starting running half speed that is what esc's don't like and generate more heat when used that way. Now for efficiency, motors suck down electricity during initial start up. So if you wanted to stop /start pump with stick input , the best bet would to keep the pump running at say 30% then ramp up to your max rpm for stick input. A lot of programming but easily doable. Originally I had that with my ex but changing radios I just said ?!$$& it, and put the pump on a dial pot with switch to turn it off on. That way if I'm in sand, not much pump speed needed, harder soil I can turn it up. (Longer run time, but not really a pressur gain as I have the prv set) I think I have the converted 4200 running around 350-375 psi, that a bit higher than normal but I made it heavier than normal too ![]() And some way to achieve the realism of hydraulic movements it to use your end point travel on your servos settings. That will allow the actual valve to only open so far thus restricting the flow of oil resulting in slower ram extension/retraction. But still allow whatever pressure you have set. And a bonus is you can have an extra valve for say a thumb if you eliminate that way of controlling flow.
__________________
Always wasting money, as the wife says. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm a firm believer in the saying " if it ain't broke don't **** with it " .......but, I also believe in the saying " there's more than one way to skin a cat " !
![]() that being said, you can definitely eliminate the 4th valve and run the system as you say. It's like changing a system from load sensing to pressure compensated in a matter of speaking. Problem is like Coop said. The brushless motor and esc in a 4200 won't like a lot of start stop. And as he said keeping a slow speed and then ramp up when running a function would fix that but then you still need a prv to dump the oil off back to tank when no function is used other wise you'll have a heat issue. I think the best thing you could do is replace the motor and esc. Install something that is capable and set up to handle a start stop type system. I think of RCP57 Volvo excavator he built. Pump only runs according to stick movement and that thing runs great! Personally I don't mind the 4th valve set up and have no servo problems.....yet, now that I've said it. ![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
original motor and esc is not gonna work for that kind of setup, it could be a fire hazard on that esc i think
![]() mine has a robbe 5055/45 motor and a robbe 50a esc. i think its intended for large scale ships. with this motor it still got plenty of power but the speed is abit slower than original.. but i like it. with an inch cut of the bottom of the driver cab it makes it all more to scale. ![]() at startup it stutters abit until i open one of the valves... but i got the old one with 3 valves. i have the 4 valve block just missing some connections.. i expect that to be much better on startup, stil not sure it would be good enough to use as start stop setup tho... i have a pressure gauge in rear cab window so i can keep an eye on it. motorstart i use a dial to control... i run the motor at low rpm, usually around 15 to 20 bar pressure against 3 closed valves. i setup the dial so i get max 25 bar, i dont wanna blow it up lol. then use the mixes to up the rpm when i open a valve... and even more when i open 2 or 3. this makes it much more precise and it doesnt loose a lot of speed when i use all functions at once. im really happy with this setup. not really expensive upgrade either... no more heat issue i would maybe look into what motors those high end german machines are using, that are running this start-stop setup.. Last edited by schmoking; 09-11-2015 at 05:55 PM. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|