![]() |
|
|||||||
| Get it out of your system! HERE! You have a gripe,bone to pick, Tamiya vs Wedico or just have to let it out! THIS IS THE ONLY PLACE TO DO IT! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd have to guess a track loader would have better pile 'dig in' then a wheel loader, just because of the traction, but here again, it would probably depend a lot on the weight of the machines, and the surface they are running on.
Those scrapedozers are interesting! Never knew anything like that existed!
__________________
Nathan |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
A track type loader has better traction then a rubber tires loader . Therefore , it has better digging capabilities in virgin or compacted soils . As said above , a track loader is meant for softer footing (to a point , they will still sink like lead in muck
) whereas , a rubber tired serves will on hard surfaces i.e, quarries , infrastructure work /repair . Now a dozer is best at pushing and grading whereas , a loader loads ( as my dad would say "best at fetch and carry " )Oh Neil who dug basements with a loader ???? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() need a hole in the ground dig with a shovel right ![]()
__________________
RIP FreddyGearDrive 2-12-59/12-19-11 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Cheer's, Neil. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had a 544 j and a 544 k both had 28L26 skidded tires on them and they both would dig like crazy and had floatation. I could out dig my dads 963 track loader.
__________________
Woodhog |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|